Abstract

Base composition is highly variable among and within plant genomes, especially at third codon positions, ranging from GC-poor and homogeneous species to GC-rich and highly heterogeneous ones (particularly Monocots). Consequently, synonymous codon usage is biased in most species, even when base composition is relatively homogeneous. The causes of these variations are still under debate, with three main forces being possibly involved: mutational bias, selection and GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC). So far, both selection and gBGC have been detected in some species but how their relative strength varies among and within species remains unclear. Population genetics approaches allow to jointly estimating the intensity of selection, gBGC and mutational bias. We extended a recently developed method and applied it to a large population genomic dataset based on transcriptome sequencing of 11 angiosperm species spread across the phylogeny. We found that at synonymous positions, base composition is far from mutation-drift equilibrium in most genomes and that gBGC is a widespread and stronger process than selection. gBGC could strongly contribute to base composition variation among plant species, implying that it should be taken into account in plant genome analyses, especially for GC-rich ones.

Highlights

  • Base composition strongly varies across and within plant genomes [1]

  • Our results show that base composition is far from mutation-drift equilibrium in most studied genomes, that GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is a widespread process being the major force acting on synonymous sites, overwhelming the effect of Selection on codon usage (SCU) and contributing to explain the difference between GC-rich (Commelinids, here) and GC-poor genomes (Eudicots and yam, here)

  • We focused our analyses on 11 plant species spread across the Angiosperm phylogeny with contrasted base composition and mating systems (Fig 1 and Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Base composition strongly varies across and within plant genomes [1]. This is especially striking at the coding sequence level for synonymous sites where highly contrasted patterns are observed. In most species, synonymous codons are not used in equal frequency with some codons more frequently used than others, a feature that is called the codon usage bias [reviewed in 3]. This is true even in relatively homogeneous genomes such as in Arabidopsis thaliana [e.g. 4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.