Abstract

I examine the evolution of alternate genotypes that use two habitats that differ in vegetative cover, focusing on the interplay between ecological dynamics of the community and changes in selective advantage. Facultative habitat choice can stabilize a predator population that would cycle if isolated in the more open habitat. This has important implications for the evolution of habitat use strategies. Local stability arising from facultative habitat use allows any number of behavioural genotypes to co-exist: selective use of the open habitat, selective use of the dense habitat, opportunistic use of both habitats in proportion to availability, and facultative switching between habitats to maximize energy gain. Co-existence occurs because the fitness landscape is flat at the ecological equilibrium imposed by the facultative genotype. In contrast, ecological instability favours the evolution of genotypes with behavioural flexibility to avoid being in the wrong place at the wrong time or selective exploitation of one of the habitats. Uncertain information about habitat quality erodes the adaptive advantage of otherwise ‘optimal’ behaviours, favouring a bet-hedging behavioural strategy synonymous with partial habitat preferences. These results suggest that ecological dynamics could have a strong influence on behavioural heterogeneity within forager populations and that a mixed ESS for habitat use should predominate.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call