Abstract
Whole genome duplications (WGDs) have been classically associated with the origin of evolutionary novelties and the so-called duplication–degeneration–complementation model describes the possible fates of genes after duplication. However, how sequence divergence effectively allows functional changes between gene duplicates is still unclear. In the vertebrate lineage, two rounds of WGDs took place, giving rise to paralogous gene copies observed for many gene families. For the retinoic acid receptors (RARs), for example, which are members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NR) superfamily, a unique ancestral gene has been duplicated resulting in three vertebrate paralogues: RARα, RARβ and RARγ. It has previously been shown that this single ancestral RAR was neofunctionalized to give rise to a larger substrate specificity range in the RARs of extant jawed vertebrates (also called gnathostomes). To understand RAR diversification, the members of the cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish), jawless vertebrates representing the extant sister group of gnathostomes, provide an intermediate situation and thus allow the characterization of the evolutionary steps that shaped RAR ligand-binding properties following the WGDs. In this study, we assessed the ligand-binding specificity of cyclostome RARs and found that their ligand-binding pockets resemble those of gnathostome RARα and RARβ. In contrast, none of the cyclostome receptors studied showed any RARγ-like specificity. Together, our results suggest that cyclostome RARs cover only a portion of the specificity repertoire of the ancestral gnathostome RARs and indicate that the establishment of ligand-binding specificity was a stepwise event. This iterative process thus provides a rare example for the diversification of receptor–ligand interactions of NRs following WGDs.
Highlights
In the 1970s, Ohno [1] proposed that gene duplication was an important mechanism to produce evolutionary novelties
Previous efforts to determine the relationships between cyclostome and gnathostome retinoic acid receptors (RARs) employed phylogenetic analyses based on amino acid alignments and produced ambiguous results, albeit tentatively suggesting orthology of RAR1 and RARγ, RAR2 and RARβ, and RAR3 and RARα [20,43]
The results of our analysis suggest that RAR1 and RAR3 are likely orthologous to RARγ and RARα, respectively
Summary
In the 1970s, Ohno [1] proposed that gene duplication was an important mechanism to produce evolutionary novelties. The timing of the two rounds of WGD in vertebrates relative to the main phylogenetic events, that is the emergence of the different vertebrate groups, has been difficult to determine It has already been established a while ago that the two WGDs occurred at the base of vertebrates, before the emergence of the chondrichthyans [9,10,11], the question whether the genome duplications occurred before or after the cyclostome–gnathostome split remains contested [7,12,13]. Recent analyses have provided support for the notion that the two WGDs occurred before the cyclostome–gnathostome split, indicating that cyclostomes are characterized by genomes that are as complex as the ones of gnathostomes [19,20,21]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.