Abstract
Three-dimensional laboratory subduction models are presented investigating the influence of the slab/upper mantle viscosity ratio (η SP/η UM) on the slab bending radius ( R B), with η SP/η UM = 66-1375. Here, R B is non-dimensionalized by dividing it by the upper mantle thickness ( T UM). The results show that R B/ T UM varies with time, reaching a maximum when the subduction velocity is maximum. Furthermore, R B/ T UM increases approximately linearly with increasing η SP/η UM for the investigated viscosity range. The model results show that the slab bending force ( F Be) and the energy dissipation during bending (Ф Be) are small compared to the negative buoyancy force of the slab ( F Bu) and the potential energy release during sinking (Ф Bu). Maxima in Ф Be/Ф Bu (≈ F Be/ F Bu) are reached in the early stage of subduction when R B/ T UM is minimum and the slab tip is at 220-440 km depth. Maximum Ф Be/Ф Bu increases with increasing η SP/η UM, with Ф Be/Ф Bu(max) = 0.06, 0.11, 0.18 and 0.22 for η SP/η UM = 66, 217, 709 and 1375, respectively. For subduction depths > 220-440 km, Ф Be/Ф Bu = 0.02-0.11 for all viscosity ratios. Assuming that in nature η SP/η UM < 1000, and that viscous dissipation during plan view curvature of the slab is ≤ 1%, the models predict that in nature most of the slab's potential energy is used to drive mantle flow (on average 88%-97% and minimally 81%), whilst only a small component is used to bend the subducting plate at the hinge (on average 2-11% and maximally 18%). Applying the model predictions for R B/ T UM and Ф Be/Ф Bu to natural subduction zones implies that in nature η SP/η UM = 1-7 × 10 2 and η UM = 0.8-2.7 × 10 20 Pa·s. Finally, the laboratory models, which use glucose syrup and silicone oil as modelling materials, highlight the importance of accurate control on temperature during an experiment. New material investigations show that the viscosity of these two materials decreases exponentially with temperature in the range 3-33 °C, their density decreases approximately linearly with temperature, and their coefficient of thermal volumetric expansion is 3.8-4.2 × 10 − 4 C − 1 (glucose syrup) and 9.2 × 10 − 4 C − 1 (silicone oil).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.