Abstract
IT may be asked by what right an anatomist, whose proper business is concerned with very concrete subjects, presumes to discuss so elusive and immaterial a subject as the evolution of the mind, even if it be admitted that the evolution t of the chief organ of the mind comes within the proper scope of his field of work. I am encouraged, however, to embark on this hazardous attempt by the considered judgment of Prof. S. Alexander, who once expressed the opinion “that we are forced to go beyond the mere correlation of the mental with [the] neural processes and to identify them”.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
