Abstract
This paper reviews the evolution of surgical technique that has occurred with the Fontan procedure since it was first introduced more than 25 years ago. Although there has been recent enthusiasm at some centers for a return to Fontan's original concept of use of a conduit to achieve the Fontan pathway, we continue to believe that the lateral tunnel with double cavopulmonary anastomosis is the preferred approach. The late incidence of arrhythmias with the lateral tunnel at 10 years follow-up is remarkably low. On the other hand conduits present a risk of outgrowth and pseudointima accumulation. Even small gradients, e. g. less than 4mm, will be poorly tolerated over the longer term and may result in an increased incidence of cirrhosis and protein losing enteropathy.Overall there has been a remarkable improvement in the early and late results of the Fontan procedure over the last decade. The role of the bi-directional Glenn shunt as either a staging procedure or definitive palliation when performed in conjunction with supplementary pulmonary blood flow needs to be defined by a prospective randomized study. Likewise the role of the fenestration also needs to be defined by a prospective randomized study including careful studies of late exercise capacity and maximal oxygen consumption. Another issue that needs to be defined by careful prospective randomized study is the importance of anti-coagulation with coumadin versus aspirin in reducing the incidence of thromboembolism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.