Abstract

American forest resource management and planning goes back to the European roots of American Forestry. Timber management plans, documents based on forest regulation for timber production, were the foundation of American forestry. These types of management plans predominated until World War II. Multiple use forestry developed after World War II and issues like recreation, wildlife, water quality, and wilderness became more important. In the 1970’s harvest scheduling became part of the planning process, allowing for optimization of multiple goals. By 2001 social, environmental, and economic goals were integrated into the timber production process. American forestry experienced distinct historical periods of resource planning, ranging from classic sustained yield timber production, to multiple use-sustained yield, to sustainable human-forest systems. This article traces the historical changes in forest management planning philosophy using the forest management textbooks of the time. These textbooks provide insight into the thought process of the forestry profession as changes in the concept of sustainability occurred.

Highlights

  • Sustainability has always been part of American forest management, but the definition of sustainability and what was being sustained have changed dramatically over the past hundred years.Forest management developed from a system that produced a sustained annual timber yield to one that meets today‘s broader definition of sustainability that considers the multiple uses of the forest and the total environment, including ecological, social and economic factors

  • The multiple use policy that has been a framework for American forest management planning evolved from this language [3], but the original multiple use policy implicitly assumed timber primacy and sustained yield as co-foundations of the concept [4]

  • Even the second edition seven years later [26] made clear that optimum timber production was the focus of the textbook and the primary focus of forest planning. Another early classic American forest management textbook by Chapman [27] stressed that these plans were timber management plans. ―The general purpose of the management plan is to bring together in one document the guiding principles and measures for development and control of the business of timber production and yield for a given working circle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustainability has always been part of American forest management, but the definition of sustainability and what was being sustained have changed dramatically over the past hundred years. The multiple use policy that has been a framework for American forest management planning evolved from this language [3], but the original multiple use policy implicitly assumed timber primacy and sustained yield as co-foundations of the concept [4]. The temporal changes in these parameters illustrate changes in what foresters consider the foundations of the profession This article utilizes these textbooks and related publications to trace American thought on forestry planning from the late eighteenth century to today. What was the political and professional environment of this period and how is it reflected in the forest management textbooks?

Early Timber Management Planning
Federal Timber Management Planning
Forestry Textbooks and Timber Management Planning
Foundation
Multiple-Use Forest Resource Management Plans
Federal Policy and Multiple-Use Management
Forestry Textbooks and Multiple-Use Management
A Fundamental Shift
Wildlife habitat condition
Glossary
Present Management Recommendations
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.