Abstract

Starvation resistance, or the ability to survive periods without food, can shed light on selection pressure imposed by food scarcity, including chances to invade new regions as a result of human transport. Surprisingly, little information is known about starvation resistance for invasive insect species. Given that native and invasive populations differ in starvation resistance, this would suggest different selection scenarios and adaptive shifts fostering invasion success. Here, we show striking differences in starvation resistance of adult small hive beetles Aethina tumida (SHB) between native and invasive populations. In the laboratory, starvation resistance of freshly emerged laboratory‐reared and field‐collected adult females and males was evaluated in the beetle's native African range and in their invasive North American range. SHB in their native African range survived longer than SHB in their invasive North American range. Across ranges, females survived longer than males. Field‐collected SHB survived in Africa longer than freshly emerged ones, but not in the invasive range. This suggests no selection for starvation resistance in the invasive range, possibly due to differences between African and European‐derived honey bee hosts facilitating a trade‐off scenario between reproduction and starvation resistance. The ability of adult females to survive up to two months without food appears to be one factor contributing to the invasion success of this species. Assuming food availability is usually high in the invasive ranges, and trade‐offs between starvation resistance and fecundity/reproduction are common, it seems as if selection for starvation resistance during transport could set up potential trade‐offs that enhance reproduction after invasion. It would be interesting to see if this is a possible general pattern for invasive insect species.

Highlights

  • Most animals experience some periods of food scarcity during their lifetime

  • Since phenotype is usually influenced by genotype and environment, the comparison between freshly emerged and field-collected adults under identical environmental conditions in the laboratory enabled us to estimate the impact of genetics versus environment for starvation resistance

  • Field-collected small hive beetles Aethina tumida (SHB) survived in Africa longer than freshly emerged ones, but not in the invasive North American range

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Most animals experience some periods of food scarcity during their lifetime. To survive such unfavorable environmental conditions, animals may enter into diapause (Horton & Capinera, 1988), hibernate (Watt, Orttsland, Jonkel, & Ronald, 1981), or evolve other traits to increase their starvation resistance (Hoffmann & Harshman, 1999; Rion & Kawecki, 2007). The SHB larvae will feed on any suitable food available (honey, pollen, bee brood, fruits and even rotten schnitzel (i.e., decomposing meat; Buchholz et al, 2008; Neumann et al, 2016) until it reaches the post-feeding larval stage (wandering stage, Lundie, 1940) It will pupate in suitable nearby soil, thereby completing the life cycle (Neumann & Elzen, 2004). Since phenotype is usually influenced by genotype and environment, the comparison between freshly emerged and field-collected adults under identical environmental conditions in the laboratory enabled us to estimate the impact of genetics (freshly emerged) versus environment (i.e., field-caught from African versus European-derived honey bee host colonies) for starvation resistance. Field-caught adults are expected to have a superior starvation resistance compared to freshly emerged ones given that there is selection for starvation resistance

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call