Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is widespread among animals, with larger females usually attributed to an optimization of resources in reproduction and larger males to sexual selection. A general pattern in the evolution of SSD is Rensch’s rule, which states that SSD increases with body size in species with larger males but decreases when females are larger. We studied the evolution of SSD in the genus Limnebius (Coleoptera, Hydraenidae), measuring SSD and male genital size and complexity of ca. 80% of its 150 species and reconstructing its evolution in a molecular phylogeny with 71 species. We found strong support for a higher evolutionary lability of male body size, which had an overall positive allometry with respect to females and higher evolutionary rates measured over the individual branches of the phylogeny. Increases in SSD were associated to increases in body size, but there were some exceptions with an increase associated to changes in only one sex. Secondary sexual characters (SSC) in the external morphology of males appeared several times independently, generally on species that had already increased their size. There was an overall significant correlation between SSD, male body size and male genital size and complexity, although some lineages with complex genitalia had low SSD, and some small species with complex genitalia had no SSD. Our results suggest that the origin of the higher evolutionary variance of male body size may be due to lack of constraints rather than to sexual selection, that may start to act in species with already larger males due to random variation.

Highlights

  • Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is highly variable among animal species, from minuscule males with comparatively giant females to males much larger than females (Darwin, 1871; Hedrick & Temeles, 1989; Fairbairn, 1997; Vollrath, 1998)

  • We study the correlation of SSD with other characters of the male genitalia usually assumed to be the result of sexual selection, such as size and complexity

  • Concluding remarks Our results demonstrate that the evolution of SSD dimorphism in the genus Limnebius was largely driven by changes in males, providing strong support for the prevalence of Rensch’s rule

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is highly variable among animal species, from minuscule males with comparatively giant females to males much larger than females (Darwin, 1871; Hedrick & Temeles, 1989; Fairbairn, 1997; Vollrath, 1998). Females are larger than males (Darwin, 1871; Arak, 1988; Shine, 1988; Fairbairn, 1997), a fact usually explained because the energetic investment in the progeny is larger in females than in males, which mostly provide just genetic information. For this reason, females should be as big and males as small as possible, to minimise resources spend on their. In the latter case, in addition to male body size other characters may be involved, especially genital characters when there is cryptic female choice (Eberhard, 1985; Kuijper, Pen & Weissing, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call