Evolution of project management in bridge construction

Abstract

The article addresses the historical aspect of bridge construction development in Russia. Based on the analysis of the collected data, we identify the main design and technological features of the industry, affecting management. The complexity of the management system in bridge construction is noted, and necessary evidence is provided. The three main production factors — resources, capital, and labor — in bridge construction strongly depend on the complexity of the facilities being built. This determines the development of project management in the implementation of bridge construction projects, including those implemented in severe Arctic conditions.During the analysis of management systems, the methodological principle of continuous technological changes in the industry is adopted. An increase in final products is considered as a result of using new technologies and not as a result of simple labor intensification, which is not feasible in practice. The process of changes in management work is considered in accordance with its functional classification, which requires distinguishing the organization and forms of intellectual labor. The model evolution is presented as a qualitative transition from directive management to variable methods based on progress schedules considering individual features of project implementation.The presentation of management evolution as a qualitative process allows us to suggest a system of production planning and management, based on internal production standards. This leads to the fact that production management processes receive a qualitatively different basis, i.e., peculiar production standards. This conclusion creates competitive advantages in preparation for construction tenders.In terms of bridge construction, project documentation loses its controlling role, representing a basis for the project management structure. This is a key sign of the current stage of project management development in bridge construction, including individual design facilities, counting those implemented in severe Arctic conditions.