Abstract

Foliar nutrient resorption is a key modulator of plant nutrient use. However, evolutionary patterns for nutrient resorption remain unclear, especially in herbs. We measured nitrogen and phosphorus resorption on preselected leaves across the Helianthus (sunflower) genus in a common garden in Athens, GA. We analyzed our data with published leaf traits and native habitat environmental data. Using phylogenetically controlled analyses, we tested if (1) nutrient resorption correlates with leaf economic, vasculature, and defense traits through evolutionary time, and (2) native habitat environment predicts nutrient resorption evolution. For Helianthus, nutrient resorption capacity is greater in resource-conservative species, as previously defined for Helianthus with a principle components analysis of leaf economic spectrum traits (photosynthetic rate, respiration rate, leaf lifespan, leaf mass per area, and green-leaf N and P concentrations). Nutrient resorption capacity also evolutionarily correlates with individual leaf economic traits, though not always as expected based on broad species surveys. Greater nutrient resorption is also positively associated with leaf chemical defenses, but not leaf vasculature or senescence rate. Finally, nitrogen resorption evolution increases with native habitat precipitation, but native habitat soil fertility does not predict nitrogen or phosphorus resorption. Our results suggest nutrient resorption evolution is more closely tied to resource economic strategy than native habitat.

Highlights

  • Nutrient resorption is fundamental to plant nutrient economy

  • Given the importance of foliar nutrient resorption to plant nutrient economy, determining whether nutrient resorption capacity corresponds with other trait syndromes is key to understanding plant adaptive strategy

  • We find more complete resorption proficiency in resource-conservative Helianthus species, as defined by the first principal components axis of leaf economics spectrum (LES) traits from Mason and Donovan (2015b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Resorption lowers net leaf nutrient construction costs, which somewhat frees plants from strict dependence on nutrient uptake capacity or availability (Aerts 1996; Chapin 1989; Eckstein et al 1999; Zhang et al 2015). Nutrient resorption may contribute to an over-arching resource use strategy, which may result in predictive relationships between nutrient resorption and other traits related to how plants acquire, conserve, and defend nutrients in the varying climatic and soil environments plants contend with as they evolve. The LES is a pattern of leaf-level tradeoffs between traits conveying productivity and traits conveying persistence (Diaz et al 2004; Reich 2014; Wright et al 2004). Resource-conservative species generally have longlived, durable leaves, but the structural carbon required for persistence results in lower productivity per unit time (Diaz et al 2004; Reich 2014; Wright et al 2004)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call