Abstract

The effects of electroshocking treatment (EST) direction on microstructure and hardness of TC11 alloy (Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si) were investigated. The results indicated that the temperature of specimens under EST along the transverse direction (T-EST) was higher than that under EST along the vertical direction (V-EST). The studies reveal the higher quantity of needle-like α martensite (αM) phases precipitated in the specimen in the case of T-EST as compared with V-EST, with a more uniform distribution of αM phases. The average Vickers hardness of specimens under T-EST and V-EST with 0.06 s were 349.3 HV and 360.8 HV, respectively, which showed an obvious increase compared to the untreated specimen. The increase in hardness was ascribed to the dispersion strengthening of needle-like αM phase, and the dispersion strengthening effect on the specimen under T-EST with 0.06 s was more obvious than on the other specimens, which was caused by a large number of evenly distributed nucleation areas for the precipitation of the αM phase and uniform distribution of the αM phase. The results indicate that a different treatment direction of EST can promote the formation of different microstructures in TC11 alloy, which demonstrates that the effect of EST cannot be simply equated with heat treatment at the same temperature.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.