Abstract

Some authors in the past based their conclusions about the limits of the metapostnotum of Chrysidoidea based on the position of the mesophragmo-metaphragmal muscle, rather than aspects of the skeleton and musculature associated with the metapectal-propodeal complex. The latter character system suggests another interpretation of the metapostnotum delimitation. Given this scenario, the main goal of this work is to present a new perspective on the metapostnotum in Chrysidoidea, especially Bethylidae, helping to resolve questions related to the evolution of the metapostnotum. This is based on homologies established by associating of insertion points of ph2-ph3 and ph3-T2 muscles with the delimitation of the respective sclerite the muscles insert into. Our results indicate that, according the position of the metaphragmal muscles, the metapostnotum in Bethylidae is medially expanded in the propodeal disc and has different forms of configuration. Internally, the limits of the metapostnotum can be tracked by the shape of the mesopostnotum, and vice versa. Thus, the anteromedian area of the propodeal disc sensu Evans was reinterpreted in the current study as the metapostnotum. In conjunction with associated structures, we provide evidence to clarify the relationships between the families within Chrysidoidea, although certain families like Embolemidae, Dryinidae and Chrysididae exhibit extreme modifications of the condition found in Aculeata, as observed in Bethylidae. We review the terminology used to describe anatomical features on the metapectal-propodeal complex in Bethylidae in general, and provide a list of recommended terms in accordance with the online Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology. The morphology of the studied subfamilies are illustrated. Studies that focus on a single structure, across a larger number of taxa, are more insightful and present specific questions that can contribute to broader issues, thus providing a better understanding of the morphology and evolution of insects.

Highlights

  • The dorsal muscles of pterothoracic segments of winged insects are usually well developed

  • According to the position of the metaphragmal muscles, we observed that the metapostnotum in Bethylidae is medially expanded in the propodeal disc, resulting a variety of morphologically distinct forms (Figs 1 and 2A)

  • The metapostnotum is limited by the mesophragmo-metaphragmal muscle that is inserted posterior to the metascutellar arm, and anterior to the prespiracular depression of the propodeum; laterally by the dorsal propodeal inflection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The dorsal muscles of pterothoracic segments of winged insects are usually well developed. The ends of these muscles are attached to internal projections of the cuticle called phragmas. The antecosta is an internal elevation near the anterior margin of each notum, which is externally represented by the antecostal sulcus (acs). According to Snodgrass [3], the ground-plan condition of the metapostnotum in Hymenoptera is a transverse medially continuous tergite that is articulated or laterally fused with the metepimeron (epm3) and anterior to the first abdominal spiracles (propodeal spiracle in Apocrita, prs). The metapostnotum is anterior to the metanotum and closely associated with the first abdominal tergum posteriorly (propodeum in Apocrita, pr), which is separated by the metapostnotal-propodeal suture (mps). The metaphragma (ph3) arises from the antecosta of the first abdominal tergum in the posterior margin of the metapostnotum and attaches two pair of dorsal longitudinal muscles, between the meso- and metapostnotum and between the metapostnotum and second abdominal tergum (T2)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.