Abstract

Understanding the processes that underpin adaptive evolutionary shifts within major taxonomic groups has long been a research directive among many evolutionary biologists. Such phenomena are best studied in large monophyletic groups that occupy a broad range of habitats where repeated exposure to novel ecological opportunities has happened independently over time in different lineages. The gekkonid genus Cyrtodactylus is just such a lineage with approximately 300 species that range from South Asia to Melanesia and occupy a vast array of habitats. Ancestral state reconstructions using a stochastic character mapping analysis of nine different habitat preferences were employed across a phylogeny composed of 76% of the known species of Cyrtodactylus. This was done in order to ascertain which habitat preference is the ancestral condition and from that condition, the transition frequency to more derived habitat preferences. The results indicate that a general habitat preference is the ancestral condition for Cyrtodactylus and the frequency of transitioning from a general habitat preference to anything more specialized occurs approximately four times more often than the reverse. Species showing extreme morphological and/or ecological specializations generally do not give rise to species bearing other habitat preferences. The evolution of different habitat preferences is generally restricted to clades that tend to occur in specific geographic regions. The largest radiations in the genus occur in rocky habitats (granite and karst), indicating that the transition from a general habitat preference to a granite or karst‐dwelling life style may be ecologically uncomplicated. Two large, unrelated clades of karst‐associated species are centered in northern Indochina and the largest clade of granite‐associated species occurs on the Thai‐Malay Peninsula. Smaller, independent radiations of clades bearing other habitat preferences occur throughout the tree and across the broad distribution of the genus. With the exception of a general habitat preference, the data show that karst‐associated species far out‐number all others (29.6% vs. 0.4%–10.2%, respectively) and the common reference to karstic regions as “imperiled arcs of biodiversity” is not only misleading but potentially dangerous. Karstic regions are not simply refugia harboring the remnants of local biodiversity but are foci of speciation that continue to generate the most speciose, independent, radiations across the genus. Unfortunately, karstic landscapes are some of the most imperiled and least protected habitats on the planet and these data continue to underscore the urgent need for their conservation.

Highlights

  • The proliferation of phylogenetic and ecological diversity often results from exposure to novel ecological situations that provide ancestral species opportunities to shift particular aspects of their life style in order to adapt to different environments (Schluter, 2000; Losos, 2009; Glor, 2010; Pincheira-Donoso et al, 2015; but see Wainwright & Price, 2016)

  • With an increase of 228 species to the data set representing all major clades delimited in Wood et al (2012), Grismer, Wood, Thura, Zin, et al (2018), and O'Connell et al (2019); nine finely delimited habitat preference categories as opposed to five; and a more informative statistical model (Bayesian vs. Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Maximum Likelihood (ML); see below), we evaluate the evolution of habitat preference across the whole of Cyrtodactylus

  • The results clearly indicate that Cyrtodactylus is composed of ecologically and morphologically labial scansorial species as evidenced by the fact that various habitat preferences have evolved independently multiple times across the vast distribution of the genus from an ancestral habitat preference

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The proliferation of phylogenetic and ecological diversity often results from exposure to novel ecological situations that provide ancestral species opportunities to shift particular aspects of their life style in order to adapt to different environments (Schluter, 2000; Losos, 2009; Glor, 2010; Pincheira-Donoso et al, 2015; but see Wainwright & Price, 2016). Understanding the processes that underpin these adaptive shifts are best studied in large monophyletic groups adapted to a broad range of habitats where repeated exposure to novel ecological opportunities has happened independently over time in different lineages on the same phylogenetic tree (e.g., Chiba, 2004; Genner et al, 2007; Gillespie, 2004; Harvey & Pagel, 1991; Landry et al, 2007; Losos, 2009; Skinner et al, 2008; Williams, 1983) This enables researchers to decipher between ecological and morphological similarities based on common ancestry versus those generated independently by similar selection pressures in similar environments on a similar body plan and genetic constitution (e.g., Baxter et al, 2008; Chan et al, 2010; Gross et al, 2009; Mahler et al, 2013; Toyama, 2017). We aim to (a) investigate the degree of ecological lability within Cyrtodactylus by assessing the frequency and direction of habitat preference

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.