Abstract
ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE:To assess the evolution of energy and nutrient intake and the prevalence of inadequate micronutrients intakes according to sociodemographic characteristics and Brazilian regions.METHODS:The food consumption of 32,749 individuals from the National Dietary Survey of the Household Budget Survey 2008–2009 was analyzed by two food registries, as well as 44,744 subjects from two 24-hour recalls in 2017–2018. Usual intake and percentage of individuals with consumption below the average recommendation for calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, copper and zinc, vitamins A, C, D, E, thiamine, riboflavin, pyridoxine and cobalamin were estimated. Sodium intake was compared to the reference value to reduce the risk of chronic diseases. Analyses were stratified by sex, age group, region and income.RESULTS:Mean daily energy intake was 1,753 kcal in 2008–2009 and 1,748 kcal in 2017–2018. The highest prevalence of inadequacy (> 50%) in the two periods were calcium; magnesium; vitamins A, D and E; pyridoxine and, only among adolescents, phosphorus. There was an increase in the prevalence of inadequate vitamin A, riboflavin, cobalamin, magnesium, and zinc among women, and riboflavin among men. The prevalence of inadequacy decreased for thiamine. Sodium intake was excessive in approximately 50% of the population in both periods. The highest variations (about 50%) in the prevalence of inadequacy between the lowest and highest income (< 0.5 minimum wage and > 2 minimum wages per capita) were observed for vitamin B12 and C in both periods. The North and Northeast regions had the highest prevalence of inadequacy.CONCLUSION:Both surveys found high prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake and excessive sodium intake. The inadequacy varies according to income strata, increasing in the poorest regions of the country.
Highlights
I Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Para conversão dos alimentos relatados em quantidades de energia e nutrientes, em ambos os inquéritos utilizou-se a versão 7.0 da Tabela Brasileira de Composição de Alimentos (TBCA), elaborada pela Rede Brasileira de Dados de Composição de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo e Centro de Pesquisa em Alimentos[13]
Conflito de Interesses: Os autores declaram não haver conflito de interesses
Summary
No inquérito de 2008–2009, os dados de consumo alimentar foram obtidos por meio de registro alimentar preenchido pelo morador em dois dias não consecutivos (97% responderam ao segundo registro). No inquérito de 2017–2018, a coleta foi feita por meio de recordatórios de 24 horas (R24h) aplicados em dois dias não consecutivos, na mesma semana em que os dados de despesa familiar foram obtidos (84% responderam ao segundo R24h). As entrevistas foram estruturadas segundo o método automatizado de múltiplas passagens[12], utilizando para a coleta de dados um software especificamente elaborado para o inquérito, com 12 opções de itens que poderiam ser adicionados aos alimentos (azeite, manteiga, margarina, maionese, queijo, creme de leite, açúcar, mel, melado, ketchup, mostarda e molho shoyu). Detalhes sobre coleta dos dados, treinamento, procedimentos de crítica e imputação podem ser obtidos na publicação oficial[10]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
