Abstract
To understand the evolution of duplicate genes, we compared rates of nucleotide substitution between 17 pairs of nonallelic duplicated genes in the tetraploid frog Xenopus laevis with rates between the orthologous loci of human and rodent. For all duplicated X. laevis genes, the number of synonymous substitutions per site (dS) was greater than the number of nonsynonymous substitutions per site (dN), indicating that these genes are subject to purifying selection. There was also a significant positive correlation (r = 0.915) between dN for the X. laevis genes and dN for the mammalian genes, suggesting that, at the amino acid level, the X. laevis genes and the mammalian genes are under similar constraints. Results of relative-rate tests showed nearly equal rates of nonsynonymous substitution in each copy of the X. laevis genes; apparently there are similar constraints on both copies. No correlation was found between dS for the X. laevis genes and dS for the mammalian genes. There was a significant positive correlation both between members of pairs of duplicated X. laevis genes (r = 0.951) and between human and rodent orthologues (r = 0.854) with respect to third-position G+C content but no such relationship between the X. laevis genes and either of their mammalian orthologues. The results indicate that both copies of a duplicate gene can be subject to purifying selection and thus support the hypothesis of selection against all genotypes containing a null allele at either of two duplicate loci.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.