Abstract

While morphological traits are often associated with multiple functions, it remains unclear how evolution balances the selective effects of different functions. Birds' beaks function not only in foraging but also in thermoregulating and singing, among other behaviours. Studies of beak evolution abound, however, most focus on a single function. Hence, we quantified relative contributions of different functions over an evolutionary timescale. We measured beak shape using geometric morphometrics and compared this trait with foraging behaviour, climatic variables and song characteristics in a phylogenetic comparative study of an Australasian radiation of songbirds (Meliphagidae). We found that both climate and foraging behaviour were significantly correlated with the beak shape and size. However, foraging ecology had a greater effect on shape, and climate had a nearly equal effect on size. We also found that evolutionary changes in beak morphology had significant consequences for vocal performance: species with elongate-shaped beaks sang at higher frequencies, while species with large beaks sang at a slower pace. The evolution of the avian beak exemplifies how morphological traits can be an evolutionary compromise among functions, and suggests that specialization along any functional axis may increase ecological divergence or reproductive isolation along others.

Highlights

  • The extent to which traits are optimized for different functions is a core question in evolutionary biology

  • Our results indicate that the evolution of both beak size and beak shape in honeyeaters was driven by a set of trade-offs among allometry, thermoregulation and foraging ecology

  • We show how changes in beak morphology associated with both foraging and thermoregulation can influence vocal evolution in songbirds, we cannot rule out a reverse effect wherein changes in song drive changes in beak morphology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The extent to which traits are optimized for different functions is a core question in evolutionary biology. We employed four sets of comparative analyses: (i) phylogenetic generalized least-squares regressions (PGLS [57]) were used to test the relationship between a set of predictor variables and a single response variable (a feature of either beak morphology or song behaviour) We performed these tests using an estimated lambda parameter to control for the amount of phylogenetic effect in the model residuals [58]. We performed this analysis using a Brownian motion model in the geomorph function procD.pgls and 5000 iterations of resampling for significance testing Effect sizes from this analysis are intended to describe the overall contribution of each predictor variable in explaining beak shape evolution in honeyeaters. This analysis was intended to test for and measure the degree of overall covariation between these highly dimensional traits

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
92. Kopp M et al 2017 Mechanisms of assortative
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call