Abstract

During the conceptual design of an accelerator or beamline, first-order beam dynamics models are essential for studying beam properties. However, they can only produce approximate results. During commissioning, these approximate results are compared to measurements, which will rarely coincide if the model does not include the relevant physics. It is therefore essential that this linear model is extended to include higher-order effects. In this paper, the effects of particle-matter interaction have been included in the model of the transport lines in the proton therapy facility at the Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) in Switzerland. The first-order models of these beamlines provide an approximated estimation of beam size, energy loss and transmission. To improve the performance of the facility, a more precise model was required and has been developed with opal (Object Oriented Parallel Accelerator Library), a multiparticle open source beam dynamics code. In opal, the Monte Carlo simulations of Coulomb scattering and energy loss are performed seamless with the particle tracking. Beside the linear optics, the influence of the passive elements (e.g., degrader, collimators, scattering foils, and air gaps) on the beam emittance and energy spread can be analyzed in the new model. This allows for a significantly improved precision in the prediction of beam transmission and beam properties. The accuracy of the opal model has been confirmed by numerous measurements.

Highlights

  • Today several codes for beam dynamics and transport line simulations are available

  • We show the importance to include the effects of particle-matter interaction in the beam dynamics model of the transport lines in a proton therapy facility

  • The beam dynamics studies in proton therapy are normally dedicated to the development of the beam dynamics models for the accelerator [24,42] or for the dose delivery system [5,12]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Today several codes for beam dynamics and transport line simulations are available. Single- or multiparticle codes are used in a variety of applications. The simplified linear model has to be extended to cover higher-order effects and, depending on the application, has to include collective effects or particlematter interaction In many cases this requires a combination of Monte Carlo simulations and particle tracking codes [1,2]. The complete characterization of the beam quality along such beamlines requires the use of two different types of codes: beam dynamics codes for the optics simulations (e.g., TRANSPORT [6], TURTLE [7], MAD-X [8]) and Monte Carlo codes (e.g., GEANT4 [9], FLUKA [10], TOPAS [11]) for energy loss and scattering evaluation in the degrader, collimators [1] and nozzle (i.e., the last part of the beamline before the patient) [12]. We discuss the limitations of the linear model of the transport lines in this facility and the improvement arising from a single beam dynamics code that includes the particlematter interaction. In the last section the OPAL model for the beamline toward the new gantry is presented and benchmarked against different types of measurements

PROSCAN FACILITY AND THE TRANSPORT MODEL
MULTIPARTICLE BEAM DYNAMICS MODEL IN OPAL
Model setup with ROGER
Particle interaction with matter in OPAL
Energy loss
Coulomb scattering
13.6 MeV βcp z
RESULTS
Degrader simulation and energy calculation
Energy calculation and measurement
Envelope and transverse beam profiles
Scattering effect from the collimators
Transverse emittance
Transmission
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call