Abstract

This entry explores the various ways Darwinian evolution bears on traditional moral philosophical debates. Moral philosophers ask: Why are we moral creatures? It is often assumed, for instance, that one's moral sensibility is almost entirely a function of one's upbringing, but the Darwinian approach encourages the hypothesis that one's moral sensibility is (in large part) a biological inheritance. What makes an action morally right (or wrong)? Some claim (but others deny) that Darwinian evolution can ground moral principles. Are moral principles objective? Some maintain that a Darwinian account of why we hold moral beliefs eliminates the need for mind‐independent moral facts. Others doubt that this argument succeeds.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call