Evidence-based reporting, methods and content of allergy-specific digital training programs

Abstract

Abstract Background The World Allergy Organization frames allergies as a “major global public health issue”, due to the consistently high prevalence of, e.g., allergic rhinitis (up to 30%). Digital training programs (DTPs) may help fostering self-management and provide allergy-specific information, given, for instance, their good accessibility. We aimed to assess an exploratory sample of allergy-specific, interactive and feedback-oriented DTPs towards the extent to which these tools meet established criteria for the reporting, methods, and content of evidence-based (digital) health information. Methods We searched for DTPs via scientific databases and online sources and developed a checklist from established scientific guidelines for digital health information. The checklist contained 44 items covering 11 domains related to content (e.g. evidence-base), structure (e.g. trainer qualification) and impact (e.g. user perspective). Results 15 DTPs covered an average of 37% of the items (score 33/88). Items relating to intervention (58%), content (49%), and data safety (60%) were frequently considered, as opposed to user safety (10%), qualification of staff (10%), effectiveness (16%), and user perspective (45%). In 13 of 15 DTPs, a minimum of 3 domains were not covered at all. Regarding evidence-based content, 46% scored on use of scientific research, 53% on regular information update, and 33% on provision of references. Conclusions Allergy-specific DTPs conform only partly to established criteria for evidence-based (digital) health information and education. The named methodological and content-wise shortcomings pose considerable obstacles for users. While there have been related, general criticisms earlier, this study provides empirical evidence via the example of allergy-specific DTPs. Key messages For DTPs to add value, service providers and health information experts need to cooperate much closer to reduce the 'reporting vs. requirements' gap. Cooperation is also needed to agree essential methodological and content-wise features of DTPs and similar services.