Abstract

A frequent assumption in ecology is that biotic interactions are more important than abiotic factors in determining lower elevational range limits (i.e., the “warm edge” of a species distribution). However, for species with narrow environmental tolerances, theory suggests the presence of a strong environmental gradient can lead to persistence, even in the presence of competition. The relative importance of biotic and abiotic factors is rarely considered together, although understanding when one exerts a dominant influence on controlling range limits may be crucial to predicting extinction risk under future climate conditions. We sampled multiple transects spanning the elevational range limit of Plethodon shenandoah and site and climate covariates were recorded. A two‐species conditional occupancy model, accommodating heterogeneity in detection probability, was used to relate variation in occupancy with environmental and habitat conditions. Regional climate data were combined with datalogger observations to estimate the cloud base heights and to project future climate change impacts on cloud elevations across the survey area. By simultaneously accounting for species’ interactions and habitat variables, we find that elevation, not competition, is strongly correlated with the lower elevation range boundary, which had been presumed to be restricted mainly as a result of competitive interactions with a congener. Because the lower elevational range limit is sensitive to climate variables, projected climate change across its high‐elevation habitats will directly affect the species’ distribution. Testing assumptions of factors that set species range limits should use models which accommodate detection biases.

Highlights

  • Understanding the controls on species’ range limits is a central topic in ecology and evolution

  • Conservation actions focused on biotic interactions may fail unless environmental conditions are suitable; it is important to understand when and where a species range is principally controlled by competition or environmental gradients (Urban, Tewksbury, & Sheldon, 2012)

  • Future extinction risk may result from different climate sensitivities, not from biotic interactions, these factors are seldom considered simultaneously in a single analysis (Cahill et al, 2013)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Understanding the controls on species’ range limits is a central topic in ecology and evolution. While elevation is a major factor in defining distributional patterns of eastern Plethodon, local habitat factors (which may be independent of elevation) influence patterns of distribution and mediate the outcome of species’ interactions (Jaeger, 1971a; Rissler, Barber, & Wilbur, 2000) Plethodon communities, especially those restricted to high elevations, are expected to be sensitive under current predictions of future climate change (Bernardo & Spotila, 2006; Walls, 2009) because of their thermal and hydric physiologic limits (Spotila, 1972). Especially those restricted to high elevations, are expected to be sensitive under current predictions of future climate change (Bernardo & Spotila, 2006; Walls, 2009) because of their thermal and hydric physiologic limits (Spotila, 1972) Both temperature and relative humidity control distribution patterns for salamanders in the genus Plethodon (Bernardo & Spotila, 2006; Kozak & Wiens, 2010), which rely on cutaneous moisture for respiration and whose activity is related to temporal and spatial patterns of cool and moist microhabitats (Feder, 1983). Our study provides an operational framework to assess the relative contribution of abiotic and biotic factors on elevational range limits of high-­elevation endemic species

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call