Abstract
Objective To evaluate and summarize the best evidence for management of peristomal irritant dermatitis in patients with a urostomy. Methods Clinical practice guidelines, evidence summary and systematic review related to peristomal irritant dermatitis were retrieved and screened from various guideline websites and databases (from their founding to July 2018) . The quality of these literatures were evaluated with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Ⅱ (AGREE Ⅱ) and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Evidence was extracted and summarized from high-quality literatures. Results Totally 7 literatures were included, including 5 clinical practice guidelines, 1 evidence summary and 1 systematic review. Evidence for recognition, evaluation, prevention, treatment, health education and follow-up visits of peristomal irritant dermatitis was summarized. Conclusions It is recommended that medical institutions refer to the content of evidence summary, make evidence-based practice plans based on the conditions of clinical departments, use the evidence efficiently, and bridge the gap between evidence and practice. Key words: Urostomy; Peristomal irritant dermatitis; Guideline; Systematic review; Evidence summary; Evidence-based nursing; Literature search
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
