Abstract
Prior research shows that a greater level of cumulative accrual earnings management (AEM) over prior periods limits managers’ ability to use AEM in the current period and has suggested that this constraint on AEM is associated with greater use of real earnings management (REM). First, we confirm this result using new, more intuitive measures of cumulative AEM and cumulative REM. Second, we document that while constraints on the ability to use AEM are associated with a shift toward REM, constraints on the ability to use REM are not associated with a shift toward AEM. These results suggest that managers shift toward REM when necessary, but all else being equal, would prefer to use AEM. We also find that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 weakened managers’ preference for AEM over REM.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
