Abstract

This study provides evidence that auditors adopted risk-management policies in the early 1990s in order to reduce their exposure to legal liability. Specifically, there is evidence that their clienteles became less risky and evidence of more conservative auditor reporting policies by non-Big Six auditors (but not by Big Six auditors). The auditor's legal exposure was reduced under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and there is evidence that risk-management policies were relaxed after 1994, resulting in riskier clienteles and less conservative reporting strategies for both Big Six and non-Big Six auditors. The study is important in documenting that alternative legal liability regimes can affect auditor incentives and behaviour. © City University of Hong Kong.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.