Abstract
This study aims to dig deeper into the role of prejudice in the civil law system in Indonesia, by focusing on its definition, types, and impact on judges' decisions. This study specifically discusses the use of suspicion in Decision Number 10/Pdt.G/2018/PN. End, as a case that marks the importance of the role of allegations in resolving civil law disputes. Using normative juridical methods, this study elaborates and examines allegations based on provisions in Burgerlijk Wetboek and HIR, as well as paying attention to secondary legal materials to enrich discussion and analysis of related judicial practices. The findings of this study confirm that the allegation not only acts as prima facie evidence but also reverses the burden of proof that must be borne by those who deny it. This is evidenced by an analysis of the role of allegations in the case that is the focus of the study, showing that the judge has the flexibility to formulate allegations from the facts proven at trial. However, the allegation must meet the criteria set out in Article 173 HIR and Article 1922 of the Civil Code to be considered valid and adequate as evidence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
