Abstract
Our laboratory has provided evidence for the first half of a model to explain both store‐operated or capacitative Ca2+ entry (CCE) as well as excitation‐contraction coupled Ca2+ release (ECC) in skeletal muscle. Here we offer evidence in favor of a model that proposes ECC acts by a relative displacement of the sarcolemmal L‐channel (DHPR) with respect to the sarcoplasmic reticulum‐localized Ryanodine Receptor (RyR). We titrated cells with ryanodine (Ry) which is known to both active (low concentrations) and inhibit (high concentrations) the RyR. We then repeated this titration after two types of treatments: conditions to depolarize the sarcolemma; and alterations in cytosolic Ca2+ levels under non‐depolarizing conditions. Depolarizing conditions, including high extracellular [K+] and field depolarization with solution electrodes, caused a shift in the Ry titration such that lower concentrations elicited both stimulation and inhibition. Addition of the DHPR agonist BAY K‐8644 caused a similar shift, although of smaller magnitude. On the other hand, altering intracellular Ca2+ through direct activation of RyR with the caffeine‐like xx did not cause a shift in Ry sensitivity. Similarly, alterations in exogenous Ca2+ concentration did not change Ry sensitivity. We suggest that these findings are consistent with our “relative displacement” hypothesis for ECC, whereby excitation moves the DHPR to unoccupied RyR, releasing Ca2+ into the cytosol from previously occluded RyR channels.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: The FASEB Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.