Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test if the transport of all nucleosides in rat renal brush border membranes occurs via a common carrier or if specific carriers exist for various groups of nucleosides. We measured the inward transport of radiolabeled nucleosides into brush border vesicles. The effect of unlabeled nucleosides present inside of the vesicles (trans-stimulation) or outside of the vesicles (cis-inhibition) was studied. Uphill influx of a nucleoside into the vesicles could be driven by the efflux of another nucleoside (trans-stimulation) if they were both purines or both pyrimidines but not if one nucleoside was a purine and the other one a pyrimidine. Thus, there exist a carrier that transports various purine nucleosides, and a carrier that transports various pyrimidine nucleosides, but the tested purine nucleosides and the tested pyrimidine nucleosides do not appear to be transported by the same carrier. Uridine and thymidine were similarly potent for the inhibition of cytidine transport whereas uridine was much more potent than thymidine for the inhibition of adenosine transport. This suggests that cytidine and adenosine can use different carriers. Preincubation of the vesicles with N-ethylmaleimide resulted in a marked decrease of the rate of transport of purine nucleosides but it had little effect on the transport of pyrimidine nucleosides. These data are best explained by the presence in the renal brush border membrane of two carriers, one for purine nucleosides, the other one for pyrimidine nucleosides.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call