Abstract

BackgroundMajor protease mutations are rarely observed following failure with protease inhibitors (PI), and other viral determinants of failure to PI are poorly understood. We therefore characterized Gag-Protease phenotypic susceptibility in subtype A and D viruses circulating in East Africa following viral rebound on PIs.MethodsSamples from baseline and treatment failure in patients enrolled in the second line LPV/r trial SARA underwent phenotypic susceptibility testing. Data were expressed as fold-change in susceptibility relative to a LPV-susceptible reference strain.ResultsWe cloned 48 Gag-Protease containing sequences from seven individuals and performed drug resistance phenotyping from pre-PI and treatment failure timepoints in seven patients. For the six patients where major protease inhibitor resistance mutations did not emerge, mean fold-change EC50 to LPV was 4.07 fold (95% CI, 2.08–6.07) at the pre-PI timepoint. Following viral failure the mean fold-change in EC50 to LPV was 4.25 fold (95% CI, 1.39–7.11, p = 0.91). All viruses remained susceptible to DRV. In our assay system, the major PI resistance mutation I84V, which emerged in one individual, conferred a 10.5-fold reduction in LPV susceptibility. One of the six patients exhibited a significant reduction in susceptibility between pre-PI and failure timepoints (from 4.7 fold to 9.6 fold) in the absence of known major mutations in protease, but associated with changes in Gag: V7I, G49D, R69Q, A120D, Q127K, N375S and I462S. Phylogenetic analysis provided evidence of the emergence of genetically distinct viruses at the time of treatment failure, indicating ongoing viral evolution in Gag-protease under PI pressure.ConclusionsHere we observe in one patient the development of significantly reduced susceptibility conferred by changes in Gag which may have contributed to treatment failure on a protease inhibitor containing regimen. Further phenotype-genotype studies are required to elucidate genetic determinants of protease inhibitor failure in those who fail without traditional resistance mutations whilst PI use is being scaled up globally.

Highlights

  • It is estimated that almost 15 million human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people in resource limited settings are currently being treated with antiretroviral therapy[1]

  • For the six patients where major protease inhibitor resistance mutations did not emerge, mean fold-change EC50 to LPV was 4.07 fold at the pre-protease inhibitors (PI) timepoint

  • We observe in one patient the development of significantly reduced susceptibility conferred by changes in Group antigen (Gag) which may have contributed to treatment failure on a protease inhibitor containing regimen

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is estimated that almost 15 million HIV-infected people in resource limited settings are currently being treated with antiretroviral therapy[1]. The use of boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy (bPImono) as maintenance therapy has been investigated in a number of trials in resource-rich settings, which have suggested that this strategy can be considered under certain circumstances [3,4,5,6,7]. Major resistance mutations in protease [10] were detected in 5/20 (25%) bPImono participants with a VL>1000 copies/ml at 24 weeks/last time-point with successful genotyping (compared to 0/8 CT)[9]. The larger EARNEST trial ( conducted in sub Saharan Africa) showed inferiority of a PI monotherapy approach to triple therapy over 2 years of follow up [11], though detailed genotypic resistance data have not been published.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call