Abstract

Social status is often metaphorically construed in terms of spatial relations such as height, size, and numerosity. This has led to the idea that social status might partially be represented by an analogue magnitude system, responsible for processing the magnitude of various physical and abstract dimensions. Accordingly, processing of social status should obey Weber’s law. We conducted three studies to investigate whether social status comparisons would indicate behavioral outcomes derived from Weber’s law: the distance effect and the size effect. Dependent variable was the latency of status comparisons for a variety of both learned and familiar hierarchies. As predicted and in line with previous findings, we observed a clear distance effect. However, the effect of size variation differed from the size effect hypothesized a priori, and an unexpected interaction between the two effects was observed. In conclusion, we provide a robust confirmation of previous observations of the distance effect in social status comparisons, but the shape of the size effect requires new theorizing.

Highlights

  • Social status hierarchies are ubiquitous in human social life

  • Several lines of research from social psychology and cognitive psychology converge to suggest that a special system exists for this type of social cognition, which handles hierarchical rank as magnitude

  • The rest were recruited from the university campus on a voluntary basis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Encode, recall, update, and importantly compare individuals and groups regarding who is above whom This informs us about who is likely to have resources and influences, who might prevail in negotiations and conflicts. Often these hierarchies include ourselves, or we must deal with individuals in them. For all these social interactions, human cognition must facilitate social cognitions about hierarchies. Several lines of research from social psychology and cognitive psychology converge to suggest that a special system exists for this type of social cognition, which handles hierarchical rank as magnitude. A key prediction of these accounts is that ranking decisions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.