Abstract

PurposeWhilst childhood trauma (CT) is a known risk factor across the spectrum of psychosis expression, little is known about possible interplay with genetic liability.MethodsThe TwinssCan Study collected data in general population twins, focussing on expression of psychosis at the level of subthreshold psychotic experiences. A multilevel mixed-effects linear regression analysis was performed including 745 subjects to assess the interaction between genetic liability and CT. The Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R) score of the co-twin was used as an indirect measure of genetic liability to psychopathology, while the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short-Form (CTQ-SF) was used to assess CT in the domains of physical, emotional and sexual abuse, as well as physical and emotional neglect. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experience (CAPE) questionnaire was used to phenotypically characterize psychosis expression.ResultsIn the model using the CAPE total score, the interaction between CT and genetic liability was close to statistical significance (χ2 = 5.6, df = 2, p = 0.06). Analyses of CAPE subscales revealed a significant interaction between CT and genetic liability (χ2 = 8.8, df = 2, p = 0.012) for the CAPE-negative symptoms subscale, but not for the other two subscales (i.e. positive and depressive).ConclusionThe results suggest that the impact of CT on subthreshold expression of psychosis, particularly in the negative subdomain, may be larger in the co-presence of significant genetic liability for psychopathology.

Highlights

  • Studying risk factors for schizophrenia can be important because of the high burden of this illness

  • The aim of the present study is to examine whether the level of psychotic experiences in twins is increased as a function of the interaction between environmental risk (CT) and genetic liability

  • Data pertaining to 745 twins without missing data were used

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studying risk factors for schizophrenia can be important because of the high burden of this illness. In the general population subclinical psychotic experiences may refer to isolated psychotic symptoms, in specific domains, that are not severe enough for a psychiatric diagnosis, but are associated with increased risk for suicidal behaviour, nonpsychotic psychiatric disorders and functional disability [4]. For this reason, dimensions of psychosis in the general population can be seen as different outcomes that need to be studied separately

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call