Abstract
Following study of a categorized list of words, 20 subjects were tested for free- and cued-recall. Order of words within categories was preserved and utilized by subjects in both tests. The results cannot be accounted for by Slamecka's (1968, 1972) or by Rundus' (1973) model of recall from categorized lists, or by a model in which order information is preserved by simply tagging items with their serial position. Data are consistent with the simple hypothesis that subjects learning categorized lists do acquire inter-item associations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
