Abstract

BackgroundAnalysis of encounter data relevant to the diagnostic process sourced from routine electronic medical record (EMR) databases represents a classic example of the concept of a learning healthcare system (LHS). By collecting International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) coded EMR data as part of the Transition Project from Dutch and Maltese databases (using the EMR TransHIS), data mining algorithms can empirically quantify the relationships of all presenting reasons for encounter (RfEs) and recorded diagnostic outcomes. We have specifically looked at new episodes of care (EoC) for two urinary system infections: simple urinary tract infection (UTI, ICPC code: U71) and pyelonephritis (ICPC code: U70).MethodsParticipating family doctors (FDs) recorded details of all their patient contacts in an EoC structure using the ICPC, including RfEs presented by the patient, and the FDs’ diagnostic labels. The relationships between RfEs and episode titles were studied using probabilistic and data mining methods as part of the TRANSFoRm project.ResultsThe Dutch data indicated that the presence of RfE’s “Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection”, “Dysuria”, “Fear of UTI”, “Urinary frequency/urgency”, “Haematuria”, “Urine symptom/complaint, other” are all strong, reliable, predictors for the diagnosis “Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection” . The Maltese data indicated that the presence of RfE’s “Dysuria”, “Urinary frequency/urgency”, “Haematuria” are all strong, reliable, predictors for the diagnosis “Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection”.The Dutch data indicated that the presence of RfE’s “Flank/axilla symptom/complaint”, “Dysuria”, “Fever”, “Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection”, “Abdominal pain/cramps general” are all strong, reliable, predictors for the diagnosis “Pyelonephritis” . The Maltese data set did not present any clinically and statistically significant predictors for pyelonephritis.ConclusionsWe describe clinically and statistically significant diagnostic associations observed between UTIs and pyelonephritis presenting as a new problem in family practice, and all associated RfEs, and demonstrate that the significant diagnostic cues obtained are consistent with the literature. We conclude that it is possible to generate clinically meaningful diagnostic evidence from electronic sources of patient data.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0271-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The analysis of data on the elements of the encounter relevant to the diagnostic process sourced from routine electronic medical record (EMR) databases represents a classic example of the concept of a learning healthcare system (LHS)

  • This paper aims to exemplify the use of FM data to support diagnostic decisions in routine practice by analysing all possible associations between all the presenting reason for encounter (RfE) in the Dutch and Maltese Transition Project databases and new episodes of care (EoC) for two urinary system infections: simple urinary tract infection (UTI, International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) code: U71) and pyelonephritis (ICPC code: U70)

  • The data collected with ICPC were used to analyse the RfE associations between these two diagnoses made during the first encounter of an EoC starting with their presentation to the family doctors (FDs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Analysis of encounter data relevant to the diagnostic process sourced from routine electronic medical record (EMR) databases represents a classic example of the concept of a learning healthcare system (LHS). The analysis of data on the elements of the encounter relevant to the diagnostic process sourced from routine electronic medical record (EMR) databases represents a classic example of the concept of a learning healthcare system (LHS). In the Transition Project, such ICPC data have been collected with EMRs in the Netherlands, Japan, Poland, Malta, Serbia, and other countries from the daily practice of a cohort of family doctors (FDs) using a similar methodology over time (one to eleven years) [4,6]. The use of ICPC to study the epidemiology of FM has the advantage of allowing precise capture of reason for encounter (RfE) data, often ignored in FM research, and this allows further important perspectives into the process of diagnosis in FM [3,5,9,10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call