Abstract
Over the past few decades, evidence-based medicine has been rated as one of the most significant medical advances in patient care (1). The ability to systematically rate research evidence should direct patient care so that the most beneficial interventions for patients are implemented. In the absence of intervention evaluation, significant portions of our health care dollars continue to be wasted on care that does not benefit the patient or has never been appraised for its supporting evidence. In the Spring 2012 issue of the Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery (CJPS), the article by Thoma et al (2) provided a brief history and detailed the importance of evidence-based medicine. Currently, more and more scientific journals are focusing on evidence-based medicine and level of evidence (LOE) rating scales when evaluating journal articles. These scales enable researchers and authors to produce better articles, and enable readers to easily understand the LOE for each published article. There are many LOE rating scales in the literature. The CJPS has decided to use the rating system and standardized icons currently used by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The editorial by Sullivan et al (3) highlights the importance of evidence-based medicine and the need for journals to embrace LOE rating scales. The LOE tables to be implemented by the CJPS were developed by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and are presented here. It is with their full support and encouragement that we begin duplicating their requirements for authors to rate their articles based on the LOE in one of three categories: THERAPEUTIC, DIAGNOSTIC or PROGNOSTIC/RISK. Each article will have its level rated based on the set criteria established by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. The CJPS’s Editorial Board will then confirm the level and publish the level with the article. The same triangular rating logo will be used in a similar manner to what is currently published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Figure 1). Figure 1 The level of evidence pyramid, showing level of evidence (I through V) and clinical question addressed by the article. Left Diagnostic clinical question addressed, with a level of evidence of II. Centre Therapeutic clinical question addressed, with a ... Hopefully, this new initiative will enhance the quality of the work published in the CJPS and enhance the educational experience of our readers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.