Abstract

Previous research on the relationship between students’ home and school Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources and academic performance has shown ambiguous results. The availability of ICT resources at school has been found to be unrelated or negatively related to academic performance, whereas the availability of ICT resources at home has been found to be both positively and negatively related to academic performance. In addition, the frequency of use of ICT is related to students’ academic achievement. This relationship has been found to be negative for ICT use at school, however, for ICT use at home the literature on the relationship with academic performance is again ambiguous. In addition to ICT availability and ICT use, students’ attitudes towards ICT have also been found to play a role in student performance. In the present study, we examine how availability of ICT resources, students’ use of those resources (at school, outside school for schoolwork, outside school for leisure), and students’ attitudes toward ICT (interest in ICT, perceived ICT competence, perceived ICT autonomy) relate to individual differences in performance on a digital assessment of reading in one comprehensive model using the Dutch PISA 2015 sample of 5183 15-year-olds (49.2% male). Student gender and students’ economic, social, and cultural status accounted for a substantial part of the variation in digitally assessed reading performance. Controlling for these relationships, results indicated that students with moderate access to ICT resources, moderate use of ICT at school or outside school for schoolwork, and moderate interest in ICT had the highest digitally assessed reading performance. In contrast, students who reported moderate competence in ICT had the lowest digitally assessed reading performance. In addition, frequent use of ICT outside school for leisure was negatively related to digitally assessed reading performance, whereas perceived autonomy was positively related. Taken together, the findings suggest that excessive access to ICT resources, excessive use of ICT, and excessive interest in ICT is associated with lower digitally assessed reading performance.

Highlights

  • Over the last two decades, Information and Communication Technology (ICT)resources have become widely available to students, both at home and at school

  • We aim to answer the following research question: What is the role of ICT resources, use, and attitudes in predicting Dutch Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 digitally assessed reading performance? We examine the relationships between ICT resources, ICT use, attitudes towards ICT, and digitally assessed reading performance in one comprehensive model using the Dutch PISA 2015 data

  • The statistics show that the mean digitally assessed reading performance of Dutch students was higher (t (511876) = 35.63, p < .001) than the international average of all countries participating in PISA 2015

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last two decades, Information and Communication Technology (ICT)resources have become widely available to students, both at home and at school. It is well documented that the availability and use of ICT are related to student background characteristics. According to the IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS 2013), boys and girls reported equal levels of basic ICT self-efficacy (e.g., searching for and finding files on the computer, creating or editing documents, uploading files to a digital platform) in most participating countries, including the Netherlands (Fraillon et al 2014). Boys reported higher levels of advanced ICT self-efficacy (e.g., building a website, changing computer settings, creating a computer programs or macro) as compared to girls in almost all countries, including the Netherlands (Fraillon et al 2014). With respect to the Computer and Information Literacy scale, girls scored higher than boys in most countries (Fraillon et al 2014), including the Netherlands (Meelissen et al 2014). All of the following studies control for gender and economic, social, and cultural status (ESCS) in their analyses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call