Abstract

Simple SummaryDNA damage induces genome instability, which may elicit cancer development. Defects in the DNA repair machinery further enhance cancer predisposition, but can also be exploited as a therapeutic target. Indeed, targeted agents against specific components of DNA repair, such as PARP inhibitors, are employed in various tumor types, while others, such as ATR, CHK1 or WEE1 inhibitors, are in clinical development. Even though these molecules have proven to be effective in different settings, they display several on- and off-target toxicities, shared by the whole pharmacological class or are drug specific. Among these effects, hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities are the most common, while others are less frequent but potentially life-threatening (e.g., myelodysplastic syndromes). Particular caution is needed in the case of combinatorial therapeutic approaches, which are currently being developed in clinical trials. In any case, it is necessary to recognize and properly manage adverse events of these drugs. This review provides a comprehensive overview on the safety profile of DDR-targeting agents, including indications for their management in clinical practice.Targeting the inherent vulnerability of cancer cells with an impaired DNA Damage Repair (DDR) machinery, Poly-ADP-Ribose-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have yielded significant results in several tumor types, eventually entering clinical practice for the treatment of ovarian, breast, pancreatic and prostate cancer. More recently, inhibitors of other key components of DNA repair, such as ATR, CHK1 and WEE1, have been developed and are currently under investigation in clinical trials. The inhibition of DDR inevitably induces on-target and off-target adverse events. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities as well as fatigue are common with all DDR-targeting agents, while other adverse events are drug specific, such as hypertension with niraparib and transaminase elevation with rucaparib. Cases of pneumonitis and secondary hematological malignancies have been reported with PARP inhibitors and, despite being overly rare, they deserve particular attention due to their severity. Safety also represents a crucial issue for the development of combination regimens incorporating DDR-targeting agents with other treatments, such as chemotherapy, anti-angiogenics or immunotherapy. As such, overlapping and cumulative toxicities should be considered, especially when more than two classes of drugs are combined. Here, we review the safety profile of DDR-targeting agents when used as single agents or in combination and we provide principles of toxicity management.

Highlights

  • Ditionally, DNA-damage repair (DDR) is tightly connected with other biological pathways, such as cell c immune system and apoptosis [1]

  • PARP inhibitors seem to be better tolerated than ATR or WEE1: G2 Checkpoint Kinase (WEE1) inhibitors when combined with chemotherapy, as emerges from randomized trials (Table 3)

  • Hematological adverse events (AEs) represented the main toxicities in early phase non-randomized trials, with different incidence and severity according to the safety profile of the chemotherapeutic partner [90–95]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

DNA replication is an error-prone process, which requires a highly proficient system to recognize and correct these errors to maintain genome stability. Ditionally, DDR is tightly connected with other biological pathways, such as cell c immune system and apoptosis [1] These interconnected processes are coordinated by eral proteins with different roles [2]. DDR is tightly connected with other biological pathways, such as cell cycle, creasesimmune cancersystem cell vulnerability towards cytotoxic compounds, such as platinum-b and apoptosis [1] These interconnected processes are coordinated by chemotherapy [3]. Increases cancer cell vulnerability towards cytotoxic compounds, such as platinum-based consists of targeting biological process, which for cancerincells with chemotherapy [3].a DDR-targeting agents is arevital highly effective tumors withpre-exi defects, while sparing the repair othermachinery, cells [3,4]. Poly-ADP-Rib these compounds are responsible for “PARP-trapping”, which implies the formation of Polymerase inhibitors have shown substantial efficacy in several tumor types and s highly cytotoxic complexes at the sites of DNA damage [6]. Figure Legend: 1L first line therapy; 2L second line therapy; BRCAm: BRCA tion onmutated

30 November
Frequent Adverse Events
Hematologic Toxicities
Gastrointestinal Toxicities
Fatigue
Respiratory Toxicities
Neurological and Cardiovascular Toxicities
Secondary Malignancies
Laboratory Alterations
Dose Interruptions, Reductions and Treatment Discontinuations
Combination Regimens
DDR-Targeting Agents and
Potential
DDR-Targeting Agents and Chemotherapy
DDR-Targeting Agents and Anti-Angiogenic Agents
DDR-Targeting Agents and Immunotherapy
Other Combination Strategies
Future Challenges and Perspectives
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call