Abstract
Thus far our concern has been with highly idealized cases of disagreement. Not only are such cases intrinsically interesting to examine, but considering them also helps us discover the epistemic significance of disagreement itself. Nevertheless, these cases are significantly unlike the disagreements that we typically discover in our everyday lives. It is thus a curious fact that while the debate over the epistemic significance of disagreement is typically motivated by looking at real-world political, religious, scientific, and philosophical disagreements, nearly all of the literature has focused on the highly idealized cases of peer disagreement.1KeywordsActual WorldPerceptual ExperienceEpistemic PositionDoxastic AttitudeEpistemic SignificanceThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
