Abstract

Threatening stimuli such as snakes typically draw attention. This attentional bias, called the threat-superiority effect, is proposed as the response of a fear module that human beings evolved to detect specific threatening stimuli. Alternatively, the relevance-detection hypothesis proposes that the threat-superiority effect by modern threats (i.e., weapons) is induced when the threatening stimulus is the most relevant for circumventing danger in the context. Although previous studies have shown that an urban context enhanced the modern threat-superiority effect, these do not clarify whether the context induced the attentional bias or facilitated the response via the fear module. Therefore, the present study investigated whether weapons captured attention in a daily context where the weapons were typically used as tools. The results indicated that weapons in the usual context did not capture attention. It is supported that the modern threat-superiority effect depends on the context, as suggested by the relevance-detection hypothesis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.