Abstract
This article explores the various ways in which the surgical and reproductive choices of individuals are controlled by the state through a comparative examination of the socio-legal regulation of the use (and non-use) of cosmetic surgery, body modification and the genetic testing of embryos and foetuses. To this end, this article draws predominantly upon critical disability studies as well as feminist discourses to reveal how some surgical and reproductive choices, such as the decision to use cosmetic enhancement surgery or screen for embryonic and foetal disabilities, are validated by the state because they are geared towards promoting socio-culturally acceptable forms of embodiment whereas other choices, such as the decision to voluntarily amputate a healthy limb or seek to implant embryos with genetic abnormalities, are rendered illegitimate and even illegal because they are conceptualised as giving rise to transgressive embodiment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
