Abstract
This article shifts discussion of the medieval in South Asia away from conversations about ‘what’ took place towards ‘how’ it is studied. Following a brief review of what defines the South Asian medieval, this article starts with the premise that the entire period has not been studied archaeologically and that there is a great deal of potential in doing so. This potential is explored with reference to recent work in Central India, which has investigated a particular set of developments in which socio-economic histories first located the transition from the ancient to the medieval in South Asia, namely, royal grants of land to Hindu temples in the fourth to seventh centuries ce. Considering these land grants as archaeological objects and situating them in the very landscapes they existed within reveal a great deal of new information about early medieval social formation and the transition to the early medieval in this region. In presenting this research, I demonstrate not only the potential value of an archaeological approach to the study of the period but also the necessity of it. Consideration then turns to the directions and form(s) that a ‘medieval archaeology’ might usefully take in the study of South Asia, which by no means shares the same empirical (text–object) and theoretical (historical–archaeological) relationships as the study of the medieval elsewhere in the world.
Highlights
This article stems from longer-term concerns with how we might best study the early medieval in South Asia archaeologically
Since the late 1960s when ‘the medieval’ was first problematised in historical research in India,[4] research on the early medieval has centred on the royal grants of land and its revenue to religious groups
Some sort of a realignment of the activities that took place there; (b) a marked shift away from an earlier centre of local power at Adam towards Mandhal, which appears to have become a centre of religious activity, while Wag became a centre of economic activity; and (c) the growth of what came to be the Vakataka capital at Nagardhan, the construction of a palace at Mansar and associated investment in the religious landscape at Hamlapuri, Mansar and Ramtek.[72]
Summary
This article stems from longer-term concerns with how we might best study the early medieval in South Asia archaeologically.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.