Abstract

Essential for successful interaction with the environment is the human capacity to resolve events in time. Typical event timing paradigms are judgements of simultaneity (SJ) and of temporal order (TOJ). It remains unclear whether SJ and TOJ are based on the same underlying mechanism and whether there are fixed thresholds for resolution. The current study employed four visual event timing task versions: horizontal and vertical SJ and TOJ. Binary responses were analysed using multilevel binary regression modelling. Modulatory effects of potential explanatory variables on event timing perception were investigated: (1) Individual factors (sex and age), (2) temporal factors (SOA, trial number, order of experiment, order of stimuli orientation, time of day) and (3) spatial factors (left or right stimulus first, top or bottom stimulus first, horizontal vs. vertical orientation). The current study directly compares for the first time, performance on SJ and TOJ tasks using the same paradigm and presents evidence that a variety of factors and their interactions selectively modulate event timing functions in humans, explaining the variance found in previous studies. We conclude that SJ and TOJ are partially independent functions, because they are modulated differently by individual and contextual variables.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Event timing abilitiesPerception of simultaneity and temporal order

  • The reported models include only factors, i.e. explanatory variables that had a significant effect on interpretational outcome, which are shown in the tables below

  • Results of the current study show that several variables can influence event timing judgements, suggesting that these judgements are to some extent fluid and that perceptual thresholds are dependent on a variety of individual, spatial and temporal factors

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The aim of the present study is to approach the question of whether SJ and TOJ are based on the same underlying function or not, by investigating whether they are modulated by the same contextual and individual factors in several visual event timing tasks that differ solely in terms of stimulus arrangements and are comparable across all other features

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.