Abstract

Carabid beetles and ground-dwelling spiders inhabiting agroecosystems are beneficial organisms with a potential to control pest species. Intensification of agricultural management and reduction of areas covered by non-crop vegetation during recent decades in some areas has led to many potentially serious environmental problems including a decline in the diversity and abundance of beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. This study investigated carabid beetle and spider assemblages in non-crop habitat islands of various sizes (50 to 18,000 square metres) within one large field, as well as the arable land within the field, using pitfall traps in two consecutive sampling periods (spring to early summer and peak summer). The non-crop habitat islands situated inside arable land hosted many unique ground-dwelling arthropod species that were not present within the surrounding arable land. Even the smallest non-crop habitat islands with areas of tens of square metres were inhabited by assemblages substantially different from these inhabiting arable land and thus enhanced the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes. The non-crop habitat area substantially affected the activity density, recorded species richness and recorded species composition of carabid and ground-dwelling spider assemblages; however, the effects were weakened when species specialised to non-crop habitats species were analysed separately. Interestingly, recorded species richness of spiders increased with non-crop habitat area, whereas recorded species richness of carabid beetles exhibited an opposite trend. There was substantial temporal variation in the spatial distribution of ground-dwelling arthropods, and contrasting patterns were observed for particular taxa (carabid beetles and spiders). In general, local environmental conditions (i.e., non-crop habitat island tree cover, shrub cover, grass cover and litter depth) were better determinants of arthropod assemblages than non-crop habitat island size, indicating that the creation of quite small but diversified (e.g., differing in vegetation cover) non-crop habitat islands could be the most efficient tool for the maintenance and enhancement of diversity of ground-dwelling carabids and spiders in agricultural landscapes.

Highlights

  • Carabid beetles and ground-dwelling spiders inhabiting agroecosystems are beneficial organisms with a potential for the biological control of pest species [1,2,3,4]

  • Arthropod assemblages in agricultural landscapes appear to be affected by landscape structure at least as seriously as by local conditions, and landscape structure substantially modifies the effects of local environmental conditions on arthropod assemblages [10,12,13,14,15]

  • Species-specific ontogenetic development could be responsible for the temporal variation in the activity density of adult arthropods, as some species overwinter as adults that are active from early spring, whereas other species overwinter as larvae and their adults emerge during the summer [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carabid beetles and ground-dwelling spiders inhabiting agroecosystems are beneficial organisms with a potential for the biological control of pest species [1,2,3,4]. Intensification of agricultural management during recent decades in some areas has led to many potentially serious environmental problems including a decline in the diversity of beneficial arthropods within arable lands [3,4,5,6,7]. Many carabid and spider species have highly specific habitat requirements [3,4,8]. These requirements are not met in simplified and intensively cultivated contemporary agricultural landscapes, resulting in the decline of some habitat specialists and shifts in the functional traits of arthropod assemblages [9,10,11]. It is not surprising that the conservation of existing non-crop (semi-natural) habitats and the creation of new habitats appears to be one of the most efficient conservation practices applied in intensively managed agricultural landscapes [18,19,20,21,22,23]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call