Abstract
The study sought to investigate the language judges use to assess performances of reality show contestants. It specifically examined the attitudinal evaluative language judges of Ghana’s Most Beautiful (GMB) show employ in their comments when assessing contestants’ performances. To realize the objectives set for the study, the appraisal framework by Martin and White (2005), which was developed within the broader theoretical framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and focuses on the interpersonal metafunction of language, informed the study. Fifty-two comments of four judges from six episodes of three seasons were recorded and transcribed for analysis. The study revealed that the dominant attitudinal resources used by judges as a means of evaluating contestants’ performances was judgement. Thus, while judges praise and admire, they criticize when necessary. Again, it was observed that the use of judgement as the dominant attitudinal device for evaluation appropriately reflected the purpose of GMB.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
