Abstract
Three water balance and yield models of differing degrees of complexity were evaluated using data from a mixed conifer watershed in east‐central Arizona. Statistical tests on simulated monthly flow volumes are provided with a comparison of 5‐year mean annual estimates of evapotranspiration and streamflow. One model accounts for 87% of the variation in monthly flow but produces the most bias in simulated monthly runoff volume. Another accounts for 78% of the monthly streamflow variation and produces the least bias in monthly streamflow volume. Statistics for the third model generally lie between those of the other two models.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
