Abstract
This article investigates the mechanisms via which evaluations of human rights trials affect trust in judicial institutions. Courts in established democracies have been able to amass a ‘reservoir of goodwill’ among the public, which insulates their prestige from the polarising impact of controversial decisions. Since the judicialisation of politics in young democracies is a recent phenomenon, judiciaries in these countries lack this reservoir. High profile judicial events such as human rights trials are therefore likely to affect their standing among the public. I argue that there are two mechanisms driving this relationship, which are activated at different times during the proceedings: citizens' views about the fairness of trial proceedings, and perceptions of defendant culpability. I test the hypotheses using surveys conducted during the course of Fujimori's trial. The results shed light on the relationship between transitional justice and the strengthening of the rule of law in post-authoritarian settings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.