Abstract
Peptide isoelectric focusing (IEF) is a common technique used in two-dimensional liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (2D–LC–MS/MS) proteomic workflow, in which the tryptic peptide is first pre-fractionated based on pI values before being subjected to reverse phase LC–MS analysis. Although this method has been widely used by many research groups, a systemic study on the optimal conditions and fundamental parameters influencing the experimental outcomes has been lacking, including the effect of peptide extraction methods, the extent of pre-fractionation, and the choice of pH range. In this study, we compared the effect of different parameters on the numbers of peptides and proteins identified using two complex mouse proteomes. The results indicated that extraction of peptides from immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips by sequential elution of increasingly organic solvents provided the highest number of peptide identification. In addition, we showed that approximately 45 more unique proteins were identified for every additional fraction collected during peptide IEF. Although narrow pH ranges provided higher resolution in peptide separation as expected, different pH ranges yielded similar numbers of peptide and protein identification. Overall, we demonstrated that the extraction solvent influenced the numbers of peptide and protein identification and quantitatively demonstrated the advantage of extensive fractionation and the performance of different pH ranges in practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.