Evaluation of yeasts for biological control of Fusarium dry rot of potatoes

Abstract

Thiabendazole-resistant strainsof Fusarium sambucinum andF. solani var.coeruleum threaten to negate chemical control options for post harvest treatment of Fusarium dry rot. Biological control of dry rot of storage tubers is feasible using bacterial antagonists (25). The impact of yeasts on dry rot has not been investigated. Initial biological control tests employed strains of twenty species of yeasts from the ARS Culture Collection (NRRL). Strain selection was based on strain isolation from plant matter or from environments that would indicate a high likelihood of strain survival in soil. The control potential of these and 29 additional strains isolated from soil adhering to recently harvested tubers was evaluated using a whole Russet Burbank tuber bioassay. At 2xl06 cells/ml, only two unidentified strains andCryptococcus laurentii strain NRRL Y-2536 reduced disease (P=0.05, P=0.10, respectively) while bacterial strainPseudomonas fluorescens 2-79 (NRRL B-15132) was more effective (P=0.01). Conversely,Debaryomyces robertsiae increased disease (P=0.05). No yeast strains significantly controlled disease in a subsequent trial. One of six additional strains ofC. laurentii (P=0.10), none of five strains ofPichia farinosa and neither unidentified strain controlled disease at 5 x 107 cells/ml whereasP. fluorescens again reduced disease (P=0.01). After 6 h, four yeast strains decreased and three increased conidial germination ofF. sambucinum R-6380 though there were no differences after 18 h. Five yeast strains, including two strains ofC. laurentii (NRRL Y-2536, NRRL Y-7139) were marginally effective in controlling disease incited byF. solani var.coeruleum S-1257. Though additional testing may identify yeast strains with considerable promise as biological control agents active against Fusarium dry rot, evidence to date indicates bacterial agents have a greater potential for commercial development.