Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of subretinal BSS injections done during vitrectomy for refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) resistant to other modes of treatment including previous vitrectomy. Materials and Methods A prospective, interventional noncomparative case series in which cases had refractory DME with a central macular thickness (CMT) ≥ 300 μm, despite previous anti-VEGF therapy (ranibizumab or bevacizumab with shifting to aflibercept). Some cases even received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection, before attempting this solution. The study included group 1, surgically naïve eyes, and group 2, cases with persistent edema despite a previous vitrectomy (7 eyes (25%)). The cases were also divided into group a, eyes with normal vitreomacular interface, and group b, with abnormal vitreomacular attachment (VMA) (6 (21.4%)). The 1ry endpoint for this study was the change in CMT after 9–12 months from surgery. The 2ry endpoints were change in BCVA, recurrence of DME, and surgical complications. Results The study included 28 eyes, 6 (21.4%) of which suffered from edema recurrence. The mean recorded CMT was 496 ± 88.7 μm and 274.1 ± 31.6 μm preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. In all eyes, the preoperative mean BCVA in decimal form was 0.2 ± 0.11, which improved significantly to 0.45 ± 0.2. In the end, the CMT of groups 1 and 2 measured 239 μm and 170.8 μm, respectively (p = 0.019). The preoperative BCVA in groups 1 and 2 was 0.16 ± 0.07 and 0.37 ± 0.14, respectively, which improved to a mean of 0.34 ± 0.09 and 0.7 ± 0.16 postoperatively, respectively (p = 0.185). Conclusion Vitrectomy with a planned foveal detachment technique was shown to be a promising solution for refractory DME cases with rapid edema resolution. CMT was shown to improve more in eyes where conventional vitrectomy was not attempted. Moreover, cases with VMA resistant to pharmacotherapy was shown to respond well to this technique. The study has been registered in Contact ClinicalTrials.gov PRS Identifier: NCT03345056.

Highlights

  • Many therapeutic options exist for diabetic macular edema (DME)—the leading cause of visual diminution in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR)

  • Despite all the pharmacological and surgical interventions currently utilized for refractory DME, the results for many cases are disappointing

  • The technique was associated with intact ELM and ellipsoid zone on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and better visual outcomes which was clearly depicted in previous studies tackling this point [13, 14, 18,19,20]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many therapeutic options exist for diabetic macular edema (DME)—the leading cause of visual diminution in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Since 2010, antivascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) have become the gold standard for DME treatment, replacing macular laser photocoagulation [1, 2]. Many eyes respond favorably to anti-VEGF agents; some do not achieve optimal edema control, and this group is referred to as refractory DME. Switching from one anti-VEGF agent to another is a viable first step for resistant DME management [3]. Corticosteroids are considered by many researchers as the main therapy for DME refractory to anti-VEGF treatment, due to their multimodal actions [4]. Despite these strategies, resistant DME cases still exist

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call