Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Multi-objective (or multi-criteria) optimization (MOO) is useful for gaining deeper insights into trade-offs among objectives of interest and then selecting one of the many optimal solutions found. It has attracted numerous applications in chemical engineering. Common techniques for MOO are adaptations of stochastic global optimization methods, which include metaheuristics and evolutionary methods, for single-objective optimization. These techniques have been used mostly with maximum number of generations (MNG) as the termination criterion for stopping the iterative search. This criterion is arbitrary and computationally inefficient. Hence, this study investigates two termination criteria based on search progress (i.e., performance or improvement in solutions), for MOO of three complex chemical processes modeled by process simulators, namely, Aspen Plus and Aspen HYSYS. They are Chi-Squared test based Termination Criterion (CSTC) and Steady-State Detection Termination Criterion (SSDTC). Both these criteria are evaluated in two evolutionary algorithms for MOO. Results show that CSTC and SSDTC are successful in giving optimal solutions close to those after MNG but well before MNG. Of the two criteria, CSTC is more reliable and terminates the search earlier, thus reducing computational time substantially.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
