Abstract

Objectives: Three-part study to (1) identify and describe transforaminal ligaments (TFLs), (2) determine the best low-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for TFLs, and (3) determine the ability of low-field-strength MRI to obtain images of TFLs. Design: Part I—descriptive anatomic study; part II—descriptive MRI study; part III—blinded comparison of diagnostic test against gold standard (MRI vs anatomic dissection). Setting: Chiropractic college gross anatomy laboratory and MRI facilities. Specimens: Three anatomic specimens of male cadavers age 60 to 85 years; a fourth specimen was used for training radiologists in part III. Main Outcome Measures: Part I—number and size of TFLs; part II—subjective grading of highest quality MRI images; part III—specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, percent agreement, and accuracy of identifying TFLs from MRI scans. Main Results: Part I—19 TFLs identified in 30 intervertebral foramina (IVFs) (60% of IVFs had TFLs), thick = 4 (21%), medium thickness = 12 (63.2%), thin = 3 (15.8%); part II—TFLs demonstrated to best advantage with pure sagittal plane, T1-weighted MRI; part III—average: specificity = 88.9%, sensitivity = 45.6%, positive predictive value = 86.7%, negative predictive value = 50.8%, percent agreement = 78%, and accuracy = 62.4%. Conclusions: The number of TFLs was in general agreement with previous research. Images of TFLs can be successfully imaged with low-field-strength MRI. If a trained radiologist identifies a TFL, there is an 87% chance that one is present, and if a trained radiologist does not identify a TFL in an intervertebral foramen, there remains a 51% chance that one is present. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:199-208)

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call