Abstract

Intersection traffic congestion evaluation is essential for effective intelligent transportation system planning, and an objective and precise assessment of traffic congestion is vital to ensure the smooth circulation of traffic. Multiple criteria decision-making is a method for evaluating the degree of traffic congestion. A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution, and gray correlation techniques are presented in this work. The proposed method applied fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of the evaluation index; subsequently, gray correlation techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution were integrated to construct the hybrid decision-making method. A case study of traffic congestion at intersections with five evaluation indexes verified the effectiveness of the hybrid method. The evaluation results of the different methods show that the proposed method overcomes the one-sidedness of analytical hierarchy process–techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution and analytical hierarchy process–gray correlation. Thus, the proposed hybrid decision-making model provides a more accurate and reliable method for evaluating the degree of traffic congestion.

Highlights

  • Because of the rapid development of the economy and the acceleration of urbanization, motor vehicle ownership and road traffic volume have dramatically increased

  • The dimensionless method was applied to normalize Si+, SiÀ, R+i, RÀi according to formula (23), where h = 0:5, to obtain the comprehensive closeness index pared with the results of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)-Gray correlation (GC) and FAHPTOPSIS methods

  • Traffic decision-making plays a significant role in urban public transport planning; in this article, traffic congestion can be effectively evaluated by a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) method combining the FAHP, TOPSIS, and GC techniques

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because of the rapid development of the economy and the acceleration of urbanization, motor vehicle ownership and road traffic volume have dramatically increased. The FAHP is used to determine the preference weights of the evaluation index, and GRA subsequently is introduced to improve TOPSIS and combine Euclidean distance with the GC degree for the assessment of intersection traffic congestion. Overall, this hybrid method provides more reliable evaluation results. A novel method for assessing traffic congestion was determined by considering the weights of evaluation criteria, the location relationship among data sequences, and their situation changes. A hybrid MCDM approach integrating FAHP, GC, and TOPSIS, called FGT, is proposed to evaluate intersection traffic congestion, making full use of quantitative analysis and the weight allocation features of FAHP and the selection abilities of GC and TOPSIS.

Literature review
Method
E1 X11
Evaluation indexes
Evaluation of traffic congestion degree
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.